Validation Gap in DHIS2 Tumor Stage Entry Compared to IARC Quality Checks

[duserik (Eric Dusabe)]

Hi @Stephano I was testing the Tumor stage, by trying to enter the values on the screenshot, and while checking it shows that I have entered a “Rare Basis” & “Rare Age Topography” and I think we are using the IARC Quality Controls, but when trying to validate the same data I entered in DHIS2, the Checking was valid, no working or error was shown. Can you guide me on that or it is just a bug.

[Stefano]

@duserik

Hi @Stephano I was testing the Tumor stage, by trying to enter the values on the screenshot, and while checking it shows that I have entered a “Rare Basis” & “Rare Age Topography” and I think we are using the IARC Quality Controls, but when trying to validate the same data I entered in DHIS2, the Checking was valid, no working or error was shown. Can you guide me on that or it is just a bug.

Hi, @duserik thanks for flagging this and for taking the time to cross-check the results against CanReg5 — that’s exactly the kind of validation we need.

There was indeed an issue with the demo instance that was causing some checks to return incorrect results. This has now been resolved. Could you please try running the same checks again on the updated instance and let me know if the results are now consistent with what you see in CanReg5?

If you still notice any discrepancies, feel free to share the specific values you’re entering and I’ll look into it further.