Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
From: Lars Helge Øverland [mailto:larshelge@gmail.com] Sent: 10 December 2013 11:03 To: Dapo Adejumo Cc: DHIS 2 Developers list Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
···
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
Thought I should resuscitate this as it seems the fix did not make it to 2.14 ( at least as at now) . I think this feature is quite important especially for use of information in the DHIS . As Knut suggested it will be better to actually have the option set in each analysis module per user but implementing that will be quite a task I imagine. The original implementation that allows a user to define use of shortname vs longnames as a global setting will at least provide some shorterm solution while we look for more lasting answers.
…
Regards,
Dapo Adejumo
+2348033683677
skype : dapojorge
···
From: Knut Staring [mailto:knutst@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 09:04 To: Lars Helge Øverland Cc: Dapo Adejumo; DHIS 2 Developers list Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
Thought I should resuscitate this as it seems the fix did not make it to 2.14 ( at least as at now) . I think this feature is quite important especially for use of information in the DHIS . As Knut suggested it will be better to actually have the option set in each analysis module per user but implementing that will be quite a task I imagine. The original implementation that allows a user to define use of shortname vs longnames as a global setting will at least provide some shorterm solution while we look for more lasting answers.
Sent: 13 December 2013 09:04 To: Lars Helge Øverland Cc: Dapo Adejumo; DHIS 2 Developers list
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
Just to find out if some progress has been made regarding this issue – I don’t think it made it to 2.15? or am I wrong.
…
Regards,
Dapo Adejumo
+2348033683677
skype : dapojorge
···
From: Lars Helge Øverland [mailto:larshelge@gmail.com] Sent: 02 February 2014 11:28 To: Dapo Adejumo Cc: Knut Staring; DHIS 2 Developers list Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
Hi Dapo,
thanks for pointing this out. Aware of the need - we are working on some underlying changes in our web api to get this in place now.
Thought I should resuscitate this as it seems the fix did not make it to 2.14 ( at least as at now) . I think this feature is quite important especially for use of information in the DHIS . As Knut suggested it will be better to actually have the option set in each analysis module per user but implementing that will be quite a task I imagine. The original implementation that allows a user to define use of shortname vs longnames as a global setting will at least provide some shorterm solution while we look for more lasting answers.
…
Regards,
Dapo Adejumo
+2348033683677
skype : dapojorge
From: Knut Staring [mailto:knutst@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 09:04 To: Lars Helge Øverland Cc: Dapo Adejumo; DHIS 2 Developers list
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
Thought I should resuscitate this as it seems the fix did not make it to 2.14 ( at least as at now) . I think this feature is quite important especially for use of information in the DHIS . As Knut suggested it will be better to actually have the option set in each analysis module per user but implementing that will be quite a task I imagine. The original implementation that allows a user to define use of shortname vs longnames as a global setting will at least provide some shorterm solution while we look for more lasting answers.
Sent: 13 December 2013 09:04 To: Lars Helge Øverland Cc: Dapo Adejumo; DHIS 2 Developers list
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
From: Lars Helge Øverland [mailto:larshelge@gmail.com] Sent: 29 May 2014 15:32 To: Dapo Adejumo Cc: Knut Staring; DHIS 2 Developers list Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
Thought I should resuscitate this as it seems the fix did not make it to 2.14 ( at least as at now) . I think this feature is quite important especially for use of information in the DHIS . As Knut suggested it will be better to actually have the option set in each analysis module per user but implementing that will be quite a task I imagine. The original implementation that allows a user to define use of shortname vs longnames as a global setting will at least provide some shorterm solution while we look for more lasting answers.
…
Regards,
Dapo Adejumo
+2348033683677
skype : dapojorge
From: Knut Staring [mailto:knutst@gmail.com] Sent: 13 December 2013 09:04 To: Lars Helge Øverland Cc: Dapo Adejumo; DHIS 2 Developers list
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?
Thought I should resuscitate this as it seems the fix did not make it to 2.14 ( at least as at now) . I think this feature is quite important especially for use of information in the DHIS . As Knut suggested it will be better to actually have the option set in each analysis module per user but implementing that will be quite a task I imagine. The original implementation that allows a user to define use of shortname vs longnames as a global setting will at least provide some shorterm solution while we look for more lasting answers.
Sent: 13 December 2013 09:04 To: Lars Helge Øverland Cc: Dapo Adejumo; DHIS 2 Developers list
Subject: Re: [Dhis2-devs] short name in analysis modules
This should have a high priority, since many charts look quite stupid and often actually misleading/wrong with long names. Orgunit names present a particular challenge, as in many countries there is a need to have “double names” such as Lao+English, since Orgunit names are currently not translatable.
But I’m not sure I would want it to be a universal user choice, would perhaps feels more natural to have it as an option for each chart or map? Or maybe as a universal choice which could be overridden for particular resources.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Lars Helge Øverland larshelge@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dapo,
this feature did not completely make it into 2.13 and was unfortunately half-done. The setting was removed from 2.13 last week. Will implement as soon as we get time.
Just to make sure I wasn’t doing anything wrong before reporting this as a bug. Users should be able to choose whether to use ‘name’ or ‘short name’ for metadata in analysis modules. This should be set by each user under their profiles……this doesn’t seem to be working – Any similar experiences or how should this work?