There is a lot of value in being able to select “short names” for analytical outputs like charts and tables, but currently this is a system setting, i.e. you have to make the decision for EVERYTHING. Would it not make more sense to specify this PER FAVORITE? And should CODE be a third option?
To make it a slightly wider discussion, to what extent are people actually using short names for?
Fully agree with your opinion about per favorite specification of name/short name/code.
···
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Knut Staring knutst@gmail.com wrote:
There is a lot of value in being able to select “short names” for analytical outputs like charts and tables, but currently this is a system setting, i.e. you have to make the decision for EVERYTHING. Would it not make more sense to specify this PER FAVORITE? And should CODE be a third option?
To make it a slightly wider discussion, to what extent are people actually using short names for?
Support to the National HMIS
MIS, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh
Telephone: +880-2-58816459 | Fax: +880-2-58813875 | Mobile: +88-01914 030 574
Email: n.mifthah@gmail.com | Skype: nayeem.a.m | LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/nayeemam
I don’t know if this feature has already been added. But my use case (as I just realized I could display the short instead of full name) is to use with external facing graphics that really need to be easy on the eyes. Currently, it’s only really an issue with chart objects I want to push out to user groups.