Fine with me if you want to integrate LDAP while you are at it.
Yes I see there's even a blueprint for this (I wonder who from?). I
actually did this once - ie setup dhis so you can autthenticate
against ldap. Worked pretty fine against openldap, apache-ds and
fedora directory sercice (now 389). Probably would against ad as
well, but I didn't have that. The trouble is I got as far as
authenticating but didn't understand the dhis currentuser service well
enough to get further. I suspect its a small step.
Bob
···
On 16 September 2011 13:07, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 September 2011 11:54, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
Could we also add "users" to the objects with dynamic attributes? We
need some more fields for alternative telephone numbers, fax, etc etc.
and so it begins ...
Sounds reasonable to me Or use ldap.
Bob
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <mortenoh@gmail.com> wrote:
A decent recap, Bob and Morten?
Yes, that seems to be a good recap. Its good enough.... for now
LDAP is really overkill for what we need at this point. We just have a
few more fields like alternate telephone number which we manage
through a seperate Excel sheet. Not ideal really. No real requirement
for LDAP just to get another number in.
···
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 September 2011 13:07, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
Fine with me if you want to integrate LDAP while you are at it.
Yes I see there's even a blueprint for this (I wonder who from?). I
actually did this once - ie setup dhis so you can autthenticate
against ldap. Worked pretty fine against openldap, apache-ds and
fedora directory sercice (now 389). Probably would against ad as
well, but I didn't have that. The trouble is I got as far as
authenticating but didn't understand the dhis currentuser service well
enough to get further. I suspect its a small step.
Bob
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 September 2011 11:54, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
Could we also add "users" to the objects with dynamic attributes? We
need some more fields for alternative telephone numbers, fax, etc etc.
and so it begins ...
Sounds reasonable to me Or use ldap.
Bob
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <mortenoh@gmail.com> wrote:
A decent recap, Bob and Morten?
Yes, that seems to be a good recap. Its good enough.... for now
I also agree that User would benefit from dynamic attributes. Right
now, I will concentrate on DE/I/OU only, but when that is finished, it
should be easy enough to add support for Users also (but no reporting
for now).
···
--
Morten
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
LDAP is really overkill for what we need at this point. We just have a
few more fields like alternate telephone number which we manage
through a seperate Excel sheet. Not ideal really. No real requirement
for LDAP just to get another number in.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 September 2011 13:07, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
Fine with me if you want to integrate LDAP while you are at it.
Yes I see there's even a blueprint for this (I wonder who from?). I
actually did this once - ie setup dhis so you can autthenticate
against ldap. Worked pretty fine against openldap, apache-ds and
fedora directory sercice (now 389). Probably would against ad as
well, but I didn't have that. The trouble is I got as far as
authenticating but didn't understand the dhis currentuser service well
enough to get further. I suspect its a small step.
Bob
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 September 2011 11:54, Jason Pickering <jason.p.pickering@gmail.com> wrote:
Could we also add "users" to the objects with dynamic attributes? We
need some more fields for alternative telephone numbers, fax, etc etc.
and so it begins ...
Sounds reasonable to me Or use ldap.
Bob
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Morten Olav Hansen <mortenoh@gmail.com> wrote:
A decent recap, Bob and Morten?
Yes, that seems to be a good recap. Its good enough.... for now
