Thanks team for this inclusion of this long awaited functionality, however we have just been analyzing the functionality at HISP Uganda and realized it solves the big problem national implementations have been facing but not all.
It solves the addition on new and closing facilities moving forward in implementation and expansion, but not the problem of upgrading and down grading facilities. For example when a facility is upgraded say in terms of services, it will be added an extra dataset that will affect reporting rates before and when its down graded it will affect reporting rates going forward and will be more than 100%.
May be we may have to think around time stamp for dataset editing/assignment and removal…
Regards
···
Prosper Behumbiize, MPH
Global DHIS2 Implementation| HISP Uganda/University Of Oslo
+256 752 751 776 | +256 776 139 139
Thanks team for this inclusion of this long awaited functionality, however we have just been analyzing the functionality at HISP Uganda and realized it solves the big problem national implementations have been facing but not all.
It solves the addition on new and closing facilities moving forward in implementation and expansion, but not the problem of upgrading and down grading facilities. For example when a facility is upgraded say in terms of services, it will be added an extra dataset that will affect reporting rates before and when its down graded it will affect reporting rates going forward and will be more than 100%.
May be we may have to think around time stamp for dataset editing/assignment and removal…
Regards
Prosper Behumbiize, MPH
Global DHIS2 Implementation| HISP Uganda/University Of Oslo
+256 752 751 776 | +256 776 139 139
I agree with you Prosper, closing dates and opening dates will not work since you keep facilities open even if the dataset is detached. May be if we track when the dataset was detached or assigned by status and timestamp (where by timestamp is equivalent to closing dates/opening dates of the dataset), then we may fix it.
Thanks.
Alex
···
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Lars Helge Øverland lars@dhis2.org wrote:
Hi Prosper,
yes you are right and this something I’ve been thinking about for a while. I agree it must be addressed at some point.
regards,
Lars
–
Regards, HISPUg
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups “HISP UGANDA” group.
Thanks team for this inclusion of this long awaited functionality, however we have just been analyzing the functionality at HISP Uganda and realized it solves the big problem national implementations have been facing but not all.
It solves the addition on new and closing facilities moving forward in implementation and expansion, but not the problem of upgrading and down grading facilities. For example when a facility is upgraded say in terms of services, it will be added an extra dataset that will affect reporting rates before and when its down graded it will affect reporting rates going forward and will be more than 100%.
May be we may have to think around time stamp for dataset editing/assignment and removal…
Regards
Prosper Behumbiize, MPH
Global DHIS2 Implementation| HISP Uganda/University Of Oslo
+256 752 751 776 | +256 776 139 139